BRAIN-wise: 5 Dimensions to Make Neuro-Inclusion Concrete at Work

A diagnosis can make a world of difference on a personal level. It provides language, recognition, insight – and often tools to better understand yourself. However, in the workplace, that same label can sometimes be a stumbling block. Not because it’s inherently wrong, but because it’s too quickly reduced to stereotypes. And because we can’t expect managers to know and correctly interpret every diagnosis. What exactly does autism mean? ADHD? Dyslexia? The answer varies from person to person.
That’s why at Mindflow, we deliberately choose a different, more practical approach to neurodiversity. No focus on ‘what someone has,’ but on how someone works. Not a standard list of characteristics, but 5 dimensions in which each brain behaves differently – brought together in the BRAIN-wise approach. This perspective makes neuro-inclusion not only more workable but also more effective.

Why We Need to Look at Differences Differently

Diagnoses are valuable, but not always useful in the workplace. Many people are still searching for answers, or choose not to share their diagnosis at work. And rightly so – openness should never be a prerequisite for receiving good support. But this means we need a different lens: one that looks at behavior, context, and preferences – not at labels.

By starting from work style and brain preferences, you avoid generalizations. And you make room for support that works, regardless of whether someone identifies with a diagnosis or not. What we need today in the workplace is not more medical or psychological knowledge, but a practical way to recognize differences and respond to them.

BRAIN-wise: 5 Dimensions of Difference

In our practical BRAIN-wise approach, we start from 5 dimensions where brains noticeably function differently. Each of these dimensions influences how someone works, communicates, and feels at work. But also: where someone stands on each of these dimensions varies from day to day, and from situation to situation. This model is not an invitation to categorize people, but rather to engage in dialogue about specific needs and strengths.

B for Balance (sensory processing)

Busy open-plan offices, changing priorities, constant switching: not every brain flourishes in such an environment. Some go crazy from all these stimuli, others seek extra stimulation. Both profiles bring value: sensory-sensitive colleagues signal risks early and maintain quality through quiet focus; sensation seekers bring energy, adaptability, and momentum in dynamic phases.

What you see in collaboration: differences in sensitivity to sound/light, need for predictability, fatigue after many meetings, difficulty with ad-hoc changes or energy from variation.

What can help at work: uninterrupted focus time, variety and choice in workspaces and collaboration (meetings vs asynchronous updates), …

R for Reasoning (thinking strategies)

Some brains think in images, others in words. Some jump associatively, others linearly. This yields different strengths: visual thinkers quickly make complex information understandable, verbal/linear thinkers build solid reasoning, associative thinkers make unexpected connections for innovation, sequential thinkers ensure consistency and robustness.

What you see in collaboration: variation in thinking pace and sequence, preference for examples or definitions, need for whiteboard/diagram or text, strength in “out-of-the-box” thinking or in exploring “edge cases”; you see both conceptual leaps and meticulous checks & balances.

What can help at work: let people choose how they share their reasoning (sketch, diagram, story, …), regularly translate between concrete examples and abstract concepts in meetings, …

A for Agency (Self-Management)

Self-management goes beyond planning: it includes starting and completing tasks, prioritizing and switching, estimating time, directing (and protecting) attention, managing impulses, regulating emotions, and self-monitoring/working memory. Different profiles provide different value: rhythm and structure profiles bring predictability, quality, and stability; response and sprint profiles bring speed, creativity, and decision-making power when things get new or complex.

What you see in collaboration: difficulty estimating completion times or precise planning, easily distracted or deep focus, sharing ideas immediately or only after all details are worked out, easy to start or strong in completion, …

What can help at work: timeboxing, visual timers, parking lot for ideas, fixed decision structure (e.g., Consent), language for difficult moments, visual boards and checklists, …

I for Interpersonal (Social Communication)

Not everyone reads between the lines. Where one person easily responds to implicit signals, another feels safer with explicit, direct communication. This can lead to misunderstandings but also provides complementary strengths: atmosphere and nuances can be important, but the clarity and pace of direct communication is also useful.

What you see in collaboration: variation in eye contact and non-verbal signals, differences in need for small talk, directness vs. cautiousness, varying expectations around forms of address and tone. At the same time, you see that one person can defuse tense situations through subtle framing, while another cuts through knots and removes noise.

What can help at work: clear meeting agreements (purpose, time, roles), summarizing decisions, space for “thinking time” before requesting input, two-step feedback (first facts, then interpretation), and explicitly valuing both nuance and clarity.

N for iNformation (information processing)

Not everyone processes the same types of information equally easily. Some are better with numbers and diagrams, others with stories and text; auditory input works better for some, visual for others. This creates complementary strengths: numerically/schematically strong colleagues discover patterns in data, narrative/language-strong colleagues create support and comprehensible explanations, visually-oriented colleagues build dashboards and visualizations that accelerate decisions.

What you see in collaboration: preference for numerical, narrative, natural language (spoken/written), non-verbal (visual), or notations and symbols (code, formulas); you see both sharpness in analyses and clarity in stories and visualizations.

What can help at work: multimodal communication (brief + detailed, word + image, …), summaries with key points, clear structure (headings, bullets), and where possible a short audio/visual explanation alongside text — so that every processing preference has access to the same information quality.

As you can see, there are strengths and pitfalls in every dimension. Moreover: the same quality can be a strength in one way and a pitfall in another. Someone who reads few social signals might be very honest and consistent. Someone who starts slowly might deliver in-depth analyses. The art is to recognize where the brain preference lies – and how to optimally support it.

Better a Ladder in the Pitfall than a Warning beside It

Precisely because strengths and pitfalls lie close together, it can be useful to think differently about our support as well. Not just ensuring people don’t fall into their pitfalls, but also having a ladder ready so they can quickly climb out. Some pitfalls are simply part of someone’s profile – and will occasionally appear, especially in stressful situations.

A “ladder” can be a checklist, a buddy, a visual reminder, a brief follow-up after each sprint. These are small, repeatable support points or agreements that enable someone to get back on track when things go wrong.

What this Requires – and What it Doesn’t – from Managers and Employers

This way of looking requires no in-depth diagnostic knowledge. You don’t need to know what to do for an employee with AD(H)D, and how that differs from what you need to do for an employee with autism.

This practical approach to neurodiversity requires curiosity about how someone functions, and the willingness to make room for difference. Not by taking exceptional measures, but by making conscious choices and thereby building a work environment where different work styles harmoniously collaborate.

The brain guide gives you concrete perspectives to look at yourself, colleagues, and collaboration. How does this colleague process information? What helps me stay focused? How do I give feedback in a way that lands?

The good news: many of the answers to these questions are universally applicable. Clear communication, predictable work structures, freedom of choice in stimulus management… they don’t just help neurodivergent colleagues but improve the work climate for everyone.

The Difference is in how You Look

Neuro-inclusion doesn’t mean you suddenly have to become an expert in diagnoses. It means learning to look at differences that matter – and that become visible in how someone communicates, plans, thinks, and works.

The 5 dimensions of BRAIN-wise provide a practical lens for this. They help you look beyond the label and open the conversation. Not about “what someone has,” but about “what someone needs to thrive.” That’s where the benefit lies – for people and for teams.

Want to Know more? We regularly give webinars about this. Subscribe to our newsletter, or follow us on LinkedIn to be the first to know when another webinar is coming up!